| 翻訳と辞書 | ・ Butler Township, Miami County, Indiana ・ Butler Township, Michigan
 ・ Butler Township, Montgomery County, Ohio
 ・ Butler Township, Ohio
 ・ Butler Township, Otter Tail County, Minnesota
 ・ Butler Township, Pennsylvania
 ・ Butler Township, Platte County, Nebraska
 ・ Butler Township, Richland County, Ohio
 ・ Butler Township, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania
 ・ Butler Township, Scott County, Iowa
 ・ Butler Township, Vermilion County, Illinois
 ・ Butler Traditional High School
 ・ Butler Transit Authority
 ・ Butler University
 ・ Butler v Moore
 ・ Butler v Rice
 ・ Butler Valley (Arizona)
 ・ Butler Yeats
 ・ Butler's Barracks
 ・ Butler's corella
 ・ Butler's desk
 ・ Butler's frogfish
 ・ Butler's garter snake
 ・ Butler's General Order No. 28
 ・ Butler's Golf Course
 ・ Butler's Hill
 ・ Butler's Hill railway station
 ・ Butler's Hill tram stop
 ・ Butler's Rangers
 ・ Butler's Retreat
 
 
 
 | 
 | Butler v Rice| Butler v Rice  : ウィキペディア英語版 | 
 
 ''Butler v Rice'' () 2 Ch 277 is an English unjust enrichment law case, concerning to what extent enrichment of the defendant must be at the expense of the claimant.
 ==Facts==
 Mrs Rice owned a leasehold in Bristol and a house in Cardiff, over which a bank secured £450 plus interest. With Mrs Rice knowing, Mr Rice did a deal with Mr Butler to borrow £450 to pay off the mortgage. Mr Butler did not know about the Cardiff property, and agreed to have a mortgage on the Bristol house for £300 and a guarantee of £150 from the Rice’s solicitor who was to hold the deeds. The solicitor held the deeds. Mrs Rice refused to execute the mortgage. So Mr Butler sued to get a declaration that he could have the Bristol house mortgage, plus interest.
 
 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』
 ■ウィキペディアで「Butler v Rice」の詳細全文を読む
 
 
 
 スポンサード リンク
 
 | 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース | 
 | Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
 
 | 
 |